For the forthcoming Syed Mushtaq Ali T20 Trophy (SMAT), the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has chosen to do away with the Impact Player rule, representing a major format change for the competition. Join betpro sign up for cricket updates.
This regulation was first implemented in SMAT a few years ago. Later, it was expanded to the Indian Premier League (IPL), where players and experts debated it.
In a statement to the state associations, the BCCI said, “Kindly note that the BCCI has decided to do away with the provision of the ‘Impact Player’ for the ongoing season.”
The BCCI had previously stated that the restriction would be in place for the next three IPL seasons or until 2027.
Thus, the decision to abolish it is surprising. As an experiment, the Impact Player rule was initially used for the 2023 Indian Premier League to raise match entertainment value and improve tactical nuance. Follow betpro sign up for the latest cricket updates.
Teams could insert players during a match thanks to the Impact Player rule, which raised the possibility that a player substituted for a 12th player could affect the result.
This gave team tactics a fresh perspective but also generated debate and controversy regarding its implications for players’ development—especially for all-around players.
Prominent cricket players such as Rohit Sharma were among the first to criticise the Impact Player rule, expressing worries that it will impede the development of all-round players.
In an interview with the Club Prairie podcast, Rohit stated, “I generally feel that it is going to hold back the development of allrounders because eventually, cricket is played by 11 players, not 12 players.”
Given that a fixed number of players should ideally play the game, he contended that the regulation took away from the core of cricket and made it more player-focused than entertainment-driven. Join betpro in pakistan for more cricket updates.
The BCCI initially referred to the Impact Player rule as an experimental measure. In May 2023, BCCI Secretary Jay Shah acknowledged that the regulation was “a test case” in the IPL and might not be a permanent feature.
Shah had stated, “This is not permanent [but] I am not saying that it will go,” leaving the door open for additional analyses of its effectiveness and continued relevance in Indian cricket.
Niraj Odedra, the head coach of Saurashtra, is among the domestic cricket figures who have hailed the decision to remove the regulation in SMAT. Follow betpro in pakistan for the amazing cricket news.
With appreciation, Odedra said, “It’s a welcome change. Additionally, as big tournaments are exempt from this restriction by the ICC, it would be beneficial for cricket players who choose to represent India after finishing their home campaign.”
His remarks are representative of a broader belief that local events should be in line with international formats to support player development.
This way, players are better prepared for the demands of international cricket without dealing with the extra complication of rules absent from international contests.
The BCCI is returning to a more traditional style of cricket, where allrounders and team balance are vital components, by doing away with the Impact Player rule in SMAT.
The emphasis on adhering to the established standards that govern international cricket in this move is advantageous for developing cricket players who aspire to represent India at the highest levels.
The rule might stay in place for a few more IPL seasons, but its removal from SMAT indicates the BCCI’s determination to keep a separate line between domestic and franchise cricket.
Recommended reading:
In the Most Recent T20I Rankings, Bowler Arshdeep Singh Jumps to Joint Eighth Place
